"Fight for the Right" unfortunately proposed two compelling arguments, which both in multiple ways contradict and make it unknown which side the author Rebecca Schmidt is arguing. She starts out giving informing the readers on the development of HIV over time and some scientific evidence about the disease. She then states the argument that makes her seem as though the FDA has the right to withdraw the right for homosexual men to give blood, however a few lines towards the end of the piece made me as a reader question what side she is truly arguing for. Overall I thought the piece was somewhat effective, however its structure could have been greatly improved. It seemed as though she elaborated some of the insignificant parts and lacked informing on some more important parts of her arguments. I believe a simple review of the writing could have eliminated some of the confusion.